Apparently, small sensors can’t do bokeh. It’s funny how often the “rules” of photography turn out to be old wives’ tales.

A cluster of orange mushrooms growing among green grass, captured with a soft background blur.
Mushrooms, Tentsmuir, Fife. Panasonic FZ150. presented exactly as shot (vivid mode).

Of course there are cameras that don’t do bokeh. In the early 2000s, I grew inexplicably fond of Kodak Advantix cameras. Bizarre, I know, but they were lightweight, easily loaded with 35mm film, and they produced “panoramic” images with ease. The cheap cameras I used were also, invariably, fixed-focus; and if there’s one thing that fixed-focus compacts are really, really good at, it’s ensuring that everything is in focus.

But almost any other camera? Hell, I still aim for bokeh when I’m shooting fisheye.

2014 was a transition year for me. Disillusioned by Olympus turning its back on digital SLRs, I bought a Panasonic Lumix FZ150 and started to explore what it could do. And the answer was – a lot. The small sensor limited things, of course. Low-light could be challenging, and shots at the long end of the zoom invariably lacked crispness. But the colours were strong, especially in vivid mode, and I could get punchy results with minimal effort.

With only a 1/2.3″ sensor, you might expect that it struggled with bokeh. Oh, no. With the right subject, it was a bokeh beast. One of the many reasons I loved that camera.

Posted in , , ,

One response to “Small sensors don’t do bokeh”

  1. Bushcrafter avatar

    Nicely written – and spot on. Small sensors don’t kill bokeh, lazy thinking does. Physics still plays by the same rules, no matter the brand or decade. Have a nice Sunday ! Marc.

    Like

Leave a comment